Showing posts with label Clifford Geertz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clifford Geertz. Show all posts

Friday, September 7, 2012

Clifford Geertz- Interpretive Anthropology

September 07, 2012 0 Comments

Related to symbolic anthropology is interpretive anthropology advocated by Clifford Geertz. Geertz defined culture as ideas based on cultural learning and symbols. During enculturation, individuals internalize a previously established system of meanings and symbols. They use this cultural system to define their world, express their feelings, and make their judgments.
Interpretive anthropology approaches cultures as texts whose forms and, especially, meanings must be deciphered in particular cultural and historical contexts. Geertz’s approach recalls Malinowski’s belief that the ethnographer’s primary task is “to grasp the native’s point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his world”. 
Since the 1970s, interpretive anthropology has considered the task of describing and interpreting which is meaningful to natives. Cultures are texts that natives constantly “read” and ethnographers must decipher. 
According to Geertz anthropologists may choose anything in a culture that interests or engages them fill in details, and elaborate to inform their readers about meanings in that culture. Meanings are carried by public symbolic forms, including words, rituals, and customs.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Anthropology as a Kind of Writing

February 20, 2012 0 Comments
Clifford Geertz initiated a theoretical assumption where he emphasizes not only the idea of  translation but also the idea of ethnographic writing as a genre within literature.A key concept according to Alan Barnard is the thick description including ethnographic details,different informants interpretations,the ethnographer's interpretation etc. 


This approach is reflected in the collection Writing Culture (1986) edited by James Clifford and George E Marcus.Geertz's emphasis has led to a greater awareness of good and bad writing in Anthropology.It also sparked debate on the creative role of the anthropologist as a writer.However it also obscures the importance of the people and society under study putting undue focus on anthropologist.There is hardly any comparison of the description.

Follow Us @soratemplates